8.2: De Kehre
Two days later, and there has still been no sign of Masongill. Unlike breakfast, which the Chairman organises, evening meals in the Potting Shed are left up to everyone individually to prepare as they like in the large shared kitchen, a bit like self service in a youth hostel. Lottie, pTravis and Masongill have fallen into the habit of cooking together though Masongill seems to do more than is strictly his fair share. So pTravis has said he will do it this evening, a bit later than the main rush.
When he arrives, he finds Lottie, alone, sitting at an empty table
struggling with a book.
“What’s that?”
“Mind and World by John McDowell. I hate it. Or rather, I don’t understand a word of it.”
“Why are you reading it?”
“Well, I thought about whether, if one of the trees fell down
and in the wood and we hadn’t seen and heard it, that it made sense to say it made
a sound or whether sounds are just our experiences.”
“You’re still thinking about that tree?”
“Anyway, I mentioned this to Hipparchus and he started to waffle
on about the difference between empirical idealism, transcendental idealism and
linguistic idealism. The next thing I knew he was talking about the ‘unboundedness
of the conceptual’ and this chap John McDowell and the ‘partial re-enchantment of
nature’. Something about how the world itself fits our language and concepts. It
seemed both spooky but significant but also somehow right.
“Ah: Max Weber on the disenchantment of the contemporary world-view.
Outside the Potting Shed, though. In the town, perhaps. Or a city. Here I don’t
think we feel the world is disenchanted. Anything but. The Poet has one on this.”
pTravis pops next door and returns with one of the books from
the shelves. He reads out: “The fate of our times (After Max Weber) by Mike Farren.”
The fate of our times (After Max Weber)
“That doesn’t sound like early Farren?”
“No. It is after ‘Die Kehre’. His ‘turn’. Lots of intellectuals
have a turn. Here he is questioning the enchantment that Weber is nostalgic
about by putting his own previous more romantic lines into a kind of questioning
dialogue with someone who embodies Weber’s target mood.
“Not one of his better poems!”
“No. It almost sounds as though it were written by someone different.
But such is Die Kehre. Mind you one of the reviews on the back mentions this particular
poem and says:
‘This is a wonderfully grounded, razor-sharp response to romantic nature poetry. By placing Max Weber’s concept of Entzauberung (the “disenchantment of the world”) directly into the slushy, pint-soaked reality of a West Yorkshire night out, the poem captures a tensionthat feels both deeply specific and universal. The poem succeeds because it doesn’t just critique romantic poetry: it pities the need for it in an unromantic world. It presents the earlier Farren not as a foolish dreamer, but as a relatable human caught between the cosmic pulling of the moon and the pragmatic reality of fixing gambling machines in C.’”
“Pretty much what I thought, come to think of it.”